Submitted by 11preciados on Sun, 11/23/2008 - 5:17pm.
Karen, Jonothan, Richie, and Kushpreet,
I thought your video was very interesting and informative. I liked how you incorporated a jury into the whole video and YouTube. I felt that there should have been more eye contact. Otherwise, it was just fine. Great job!
My role in the actual video was the defendant, but besides that I did all of the editting and encoding to produce the final product. Making the video a hypothetical court case was my proposal. This court case made me rethink my standpoint on streaming video violatiing copyright laws. We chose streaming video because streaming video is a big part of everyones lives, YouTube videos are exchanged by students every day.
Submitted by 11ibojiej on Thu, 11/20/2008 - 9:37am.
WOOT i love my family and my friends. Peace =D
what i did in the video is act like the jury. as a juryer in the jury i had to decide the verdict for google. i did that because that is the jurors job in a trail. as a juror i said the verdict for youtube was innocent and drop all the charges.
Submitted by 11oconnork on Thu, 11/20/2008 - 9:34am.
your video reminds me of the cases we learned about in tech class. about how certain companies like youtube should keep better watch on what their users post on their site. Good job !
I was part of this group =]. I researched some of the information that was used in this video and I also wrote my own speech. My role in this video was to be the judge of the trial between Youtube and the MPAA. I was also the camera person for the video.
Submitted by 11myszkowskio on Thu, 11/20/2008 - 9:20am.
I agree with the jury becasue its up to the people wether or not they want to watch the video and its not youtube's fault even if it is illegal. If anything, youtube should take down whatever is illegal. Overall I enjoyed watching the video becasue it was entertaining.
Submitted by 11cepinj on Thu, 11/20/2008 - 9:35am.
I agree with this post but i think youtube is able to stop people from uploading illegal content at a faster rate they are doing now. But alot of people on youtube are looking at this illegal content so if they get rid of it they might lose alot of viewers.
Interesting...
Karen, Jonothan, Richie, and Kushpreet,
I thought your video was very interesting and informative. I liked how you incorporated a jury into the whole video and YouTube. I felt that there should have been more eye contact. Otherwise, it was just fine. Great job!
Dear Karen Richie Kush and
Dear Karen Richie Kush and jonathan
i liked that you made your project like a trial. I think that it would have worked out better if ou weren't readiong off of the paper.
YOU had plenty info in your
YOU had plenty info in your video.
good job, good amount of
Dear kush, richie, jonathan, Karen
What I noticed most about, "Streaming Video," was that it was very informative.
I liked how you guys presented your information and how each of you had something of importance to say.
My Contribution
My role in the actual video was the defendant, but besides that I did all of the editting and encoding to produce the final product. Making the video a hypothetical court case was my proposal. This court case made me rethink my standpoint on streaming video violatiing copyright laws. We chose streaming video because streaming video is a big part of everyones lives, YouTube videos are exchanged by students every day.
its jonathan
WOOT i love my family and my friends. Peace =D
what i did in the video is act like the jury. as a juryer in the jury i had to decide the verdict for google. i did that because that is the jurors job in a trail. as a juror i said the verdict for youtube was innocent and drop all the charges.
your video reminds me of the
your video reminds me of the cases we learned about in tech class. about how certain companies like youtube should keep better watch on what their users post on their site. Good job !
My Participation in the Project
I was part of this group =]. I researched some of the information that was used in this video and I also wrote my own speech. My role in this video was to be the judge of the trial between Youtube and the MPAA. I was also the camera person for the video.
I agree with the jury
I agree with the jury becasue its up to the people wether or not they want to watch the video and its not youtube's fault even if it is illegal. If anything, youtube should take down whatever is illegal. Overall I enjoyed watching the video becasue it was entertaining.
I agree with this post but i
I agree with this post but i think youtube is able to stop people from uploading illegal content at a faster rate they are doing now. But alot of people on youtube are looking at this illegal content so if they get rid of it they might lose alot of viewers.